Já começou: EUA invade a Síria.
October 31, 2015 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - As previously warned about in June of 2015, the United States has announced that it will officially begin ground operations in Syria through the use of special forces. The Washington Post in its article, "Obama seeks to intensify operations in Syria with Special Ops troops,"would report that: President Obama is sending a small number of Special Operations troops to northern Syria, marking the first full-time deployment of U.S. forces to the chaotic country. The mission marks a major shift for Obama, whose determination to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has been balanced by an abiding worry that U.S. troops not be pulled too deeply into the intractable Syrian conflict. The latest deployment will involve fewer than 50 Special Operations advisers, who will work with resistance forces battling the Islamic State in northern Syria but will not engage in direct combat, Obama administration officials said.
Admission of Special Forces in Syria is Just the Beginning
While the US claims this move is to "defeat the Islamic State (ISIS)," it is instead clearly a move to establish long-sought "buffer zones" or "safe zones" in Syria where the Syrian government can no longer operate. US airpower will also undoubtedly be used to cover these special forces, creating a defacto no-fly-zone wherever they operate. The map accompanying the Washington Post article clearly shows ISIS territory straddling the last remaining supply corridor being used to supply the terror group as well as others including Al Qaeda's al Nusra Front from NATO-member Turkey's territory. US special forces will likely begin operating in these areas, and zones carved out as US operations expand. The eventual outcome, if these operations are successful, will be the division and destruction of Syria as a nation-state. This is more than mere speculation - this is a conclusion drawn by signed and dated policy papers produced by the Brookings Institution, who has called for such zones since as early as 2012, but under different contrived pretexts.
In the March 2012 Brookings Institution"Middle East Memo #21" "Assessing Options for Regime Change" it is stated specifically (emphasis added): An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan’s leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts.More recently, in a June 2015 Brookings document literally titled, "Deconstructing Syria: A new strategy for America’s most hopeless war," it is stated that (emphasis added): The idea would be to help moderate elements establish reliable safe zones within Syria once they were able. American, as well as Saudi and Turkish and British and Jordanian and other Arab forces would act in support, not only from the air but eventually on the ground via the presence of special forces as well. The approach would benefit from Syria’s open desert terrain which could allow creation of buffer zones that could be monitored for possible signs of enemy attack through a combination of technologies, patrols, and other methods that outside special forces could help Syrian local fighters set up. Were Assad foolish enough to challenge these zones, even if he somehow forced the withdrawal of the outside special forces, he would be likely to lose his air power in ensuing retaliatory strikes by outside forces, depriving his military of one of its few advantages over ISIL.Thus, he would be unlikely to do this.
Reuters - Associated Press - Israel National News - YouTube - Yahoo - Press TV - Sputnik.
Nov 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 - clik 4 - clik 5 - clik 6
Reuters - Associated Press - Israel National News - YouTube - Yahoo - Press TV - Sputnik.
Nov 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 - clik 4 - clik 5 - clik 6
Síria rejeita: "é uma intervenção ilegal, é ato de agressão pois não há autorização do governo".
A Syrian member of parliament on Saturday blasted the United States'decision to send troops into Syria as an “act of aggression”. Speaking to The Associated Press (AP), the lawmaker, Sharif Shehadeh, said the American troops will have no effect on the ground, but Washington wants to say it is present in Syria. "What has happened to make America realize, after five years, that it should send between 30 and 50 military advisers?" asked Shehadeh, referring to the start of the country's civil war in March 2011 that has since killed more than 250,000 people.
"When America sends ground forces into Syrian territories without an agreement with the Syrian government it becomes an intervention and aggression," he stated. "Will America allow Russian ground forces to go into America without an agreement? I think the answer is no." On Friday, President Barack Obama okayed a deployment of "fewer than 50" special operations forces in the north of Syria, in a bid to strengthen forces fighting the Islamic State (ISIS) group. Secretary of State John Kerry on Saturday refused to rule out more American commandos being sent to Syria beyond the 50 announced Friday. Speaking in the Kyrgyz capital during a tour of Central Asia, Kerry said he fully supported Obama's decision to put troops on the ground in Syria - which comes just weeks after Russia's surprising deployment in the war torn state. Asked whether he could rule out more troops being assigned to the mission, he said, "I can't predict what the future will bring when our policy is to destroy Daesh, to fight back against this evil. But I do think the president has made a judgment that I completely advocated for and concur in."
Rússia já adverte: "É inaceitável. Sem permissão da Síria, nenhum país pode ali usar fôrça militar".
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Friday that no country could use military force in Syria without first securing the agreement of the Syrian government, the TASS news agency reported. TASS said Ryabkov was responding to a question about the prospect of the United States launching a ground operation in Syria. "The question of using military force in any form without the agreement of Damascus is for us unacceptable," it quoted him as saying.
