U.K. quer fim da livre expressão:
"É terrorista quem questionar a versão do governo sobre 9-11".
David Cameron in UN speech says anyone questioning the 9/11 official story is a terror extremist.
UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s address at the 69th Session of the UN General Assembly’s was more than the expected call to arms against Syria. It was a frontal assault against free intellectual inquiry and compared questions about the involvement of governments and rogue elements within governments in false flag terrorism with terrorism and extremism itself. Free intellectual inquiry in the world of David Cameron is on a slippery slope that leads to a totalitarian UK and a totalitarian West.
"We know this world view; The peddling of lies that 9/11 as somehow a Jewish plot, or that the 7/7 attacks in London were staged. … We must be clear, to defeat the ideology of extremism, not just violent extremism. But I would ask you, would we allow right-wing extremism or the Ku Klux Clan to recruit on our campuses? No! So why shouldn’t we stand by and allow any form of non-violent extremism".
The scope of Cameron’s tendency to limit the freedom of speech and free intellectual and academic inquiry, however, became obvious when Cameron directly compared this ”dangerous world view” with those who raise justified questions about the involvement of deep state elements or rogue networks in false flag terrorism. Indeed, Cameron’s conclusion is setting the stage for a rapid decline into totalitarianism where raising justified questions about state crimes equals terrorism. Cameron followed-up on this statement by calling for stricter action against terrorists on-line material, and included universities as possible targets for this crack-down. He noted that some would argue that this is not compatible with free speech and free intellectual inquiry.
Cameron launched his address, referring to the situation in Ukraine as attack against one of the UN member states, but omitted the questionable legality of the coup d’Ètat on February 22, 2014, and the fact that experts on international law are far from unanimous in their interpretation of thelegality or illegality of Crimea’s secession and accession into the Russian Federation. Cameron also omitted the fact that the coup, or at the very least important aspects of it, were micro-managed by U.S. Officials like U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland and the British Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union, Barones Catherine Ashton. A leaked phone call between Ashton and Estonian Foreign Minister Umeas Paet was but one indication for the micro-management, including the mass murder of Ukrainian police officers and protesters alike, which served as pretext for the coup d’ État. Cameron also omitted that analysts, as early as December 2013, after U.S’. and British officials did their’s to engineer a failure of negotiations between Russia and the EU about the Third EU Energy Package stressed that a war in Ukraine had become unavoidable, and that it was closely related to the failure to oust the Syrian government as swiftly as the government of Libya in 2011.
The scope of Cameron’s tendency to limit the freedom of speech and free intellectual and academic inquiry, however, became obvious when Cameron directly compared this ”dangerous world view” with those who raise justified questions about the involvement of deep state elements or rogue networks in false flag terrorism. Indeed, Cameron’s conclusion is setting the stage for a rapid decline into totalitarianism where raising justified questions about state crimes equals terrorism. Cameron followed-up on this statement by calling for stricter action against terrorists on-line material, and included universities as possible targets for this crack-down. He noted that some would argue that this is not compatible with free speech and free intellectual inquiry.
Cameron launched his address, referring to the situation in Ukraine as attack against one of the UN member states, but omitted the questionable legality of the coup d’Ètat on February 22, 2014, and the fact that experts on international law are far from unanimous in their interpretation of thelegality or illegality of Crimea’s secession and accession into the Russian Federation. Cameron also omitted the fact that the coup, or at the very least important aspects of it, were micro-managed by U.S. Officials like U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland and the British Foreign Policy Chief of the European Union, Barones Catherine Ashton. A leaked phone call between Ashton and Estonian Foreign Minister Umeas Paet was but one indication for the micro-management, including the mass murder of Ukrainian police officers and protesters alike, which served as pretext for the coup d’ État. Cameron also omitted that analysts, as early as December 2013, after U.S’. and British officials did their’s to engineer a failure of negotiations between Russia and the EU about the Third EU Energy Package stressed that a war in Ukraine had become unavoidable, and that it was closely related to the failure to oust the Syrian government as swiftly as the government of Libya in 2011.
