30 julho 2015


Global Times - Zero Hedge - Jul 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
Sinais de novos tempos: China já zomba do G7, "endividados em reunião, um clube obsoleto".
The Global Times (which, it should be noted, is owned by the ruling Communist Party’s official newspaper, the People’s Daily) has more on why the G7 is largely irrelevant in the modern world. Via The Global TimesThe G7 summit concluded in Germany last week. Chinese scholars and media barely showed any interest to this outdated informal institution, except for a Declaration on Maritime Security issued by G7 foreign ministers. The declaration expressed their concerns on "unilateral actions" in the South China Sea, with China as the obvious target. Judging from the agenda and outcomes of this year's G7 summit, it has run counter to the global trend of peace, development and cooperation and become mere of a geopolitical tool. Since the very beginning of the establishment of the G7, it has been a rich-man's club that consists of Western major powers and aims to maintain the collective hegemony of the US-led West. It used to focus on the world's economic issues, and then extended to political and security affairs. After the Cold War, Russia was included in this grouping, which almost became the core of global governance and looked as though it might replace the UN Security Council.  However, the other G7 members never treated Russia as an equal partner. 
Russia was only entitled to discuss politics and security but not financial and economic issues. As the world entered the 21st century, new economies started to emerge and the world's political and economic center has gradually shifted to the Asia-Pacific. The 2008 global financial crisis forced G7 members into a stalemate, and these nations started to realize that they could only get rid of the crisis with the help of emerging economies. Therefore, the US proposed defining the G20 as the main platform to discuss international economic problems. Within the G20, although the G7, as a sub group, intends to dominate the agenda-setting, the G7 cannot play its role without cooperation from new economies whose voices can be heard more nowadays. 
Yet countries such as the US and Japan can hardly accept the rising international status of emerging economies and are reluctant to give up their hegemony. When the financial crisis eased slightly, Western media vigorously propagated the "revival" of the G7. But the economic performance of G7 members meant the summit was a gathering of debtors. To some extent, the role of the G7 in global economic governance is negative. The IMF and the World Bank are under the control of G7 members. This is one of the reasons for the low implementation capacity of the G20. 

29 julho 2015


Reuters - New Eastern Outlook - Jul 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 - clik 4
China: infiltração subversiva foi sustada. ONGs dos EUA turbinam desestabilização interna.
China has recently taken an important step in more tightly regulating foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) inside the country. Despite condemnation from so called human rights groups in the West, China’s move should be understood as a critical decision to assert sovereignty over its own political space. Naturally, the shrill cries of “repression” and “hostility toward civil society” from western NGOs have done little to shake the resolve of Beijing as the government has recognized the critical importance of cutting off all avenues for political and social destabilization. The predictable argument, once again being made against China’sOverseas NGO Management Law, is that it is a restriction on freedom of association and expression, and a means of stifling the burgeoning civil society sector in China. 
The NGO advocates portray this proposed legislation as another example of the violation of human rights in China, and further evidence of Beijing’s lack of commitment to them. They posit that China is moving to further entrench an authoritarian government by closing off the democratic space which has emerged in recent years. However, amid all the hand-wringing about human rights and democracy, what is conveniently left out of the narrative is the simple fact that foreign NGOs, and domestic ones funded by foreign money, are, to a large extent, agents of foreign interests, and are quite used as soft power weapons for destabilization. And this is no mere conspiracy theory as the documented record of the role of NGOs in recent political unrest in China is voluminous. It would not be a stretch to say that Beijing has finally recognized, just as Russia has before it, that in order to maintain political stability and true sovereignty, it must be able to control the civil society space otherwise manipulated by the US and its allies.
Rússia expele ONG filhote-CIA: "ameaça à ordem constitucional e à capacidade de defesa do país".
The National Endowment for Democracy, a Washington-based nonprofit funded largely by the US Congress, has become the first group to be banned in Russia under a law against “undesirable” international nongovernmental organisations. According to its website, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is “dedicated to the growth and strengthening of democratic institutions around the world” and has funded local non-governmental organisations in more than 90 countries. But in a statement on Tuesday, the prosecutor general’s office said it “poses a threat to the constitutional order of the Russian Federation and the defensive capability and security of the government”. “Using Russian commercial and noncommercial organisations under its control, the National Endowment for Democracy participated in work to declare the results of election campaigns illegitimate, organise political actions intended to influence decisions made by the authorities, and discredit service in Russia’s armed forces,” the statement saidUnder legislation signed by president Vladimir Putin in May, the Russian authorities can shut down “undesirable” NGOs without a court order if the prosecutor general determines they pose a threat to national security. The law’s vague phrasings mean foreign companies could also be shut down, although it primarily seems directed at NGOs. 
 Lei russa anti-subversão interna é quase idêntica à dos EUA.
Russian law requiring outside-funded political organizations to register as “foreign agents” was modeled on a U.S. law, the Foreign Agent Registration Act. In other words, the U.S. government also requires individuals and entities working for foreign interests and seeking to influence U.S. policies to disclose those relationships with the U.S. Justice Department or face prison. The reference to how a “foreign agents” registration law conflicts with international law might have been a good place for Gershman to explain why what is good for the goose in the United States isn’t good for the gander in Russia. But hypocrisy is a hard thing to rationalize and would have undermined the propagandistic impact of the op-ed. So would an acknowledgement of where NED’s money comes from. How many governments would allow a hostile foreign power to sponsor politicians and civic organizations whose mission is to undermine and overthrow the existing government and put in someone who would be compliant to that foreign power?

The Huffington Post - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 
N.E.D. foi criada pela CIA para desestabilizar governos pelo mundo afora, atua em 90 países.
The first is that NED is a U.S. government-funded organization created in 1983 to do what the Central Intelligence Agency previously had done in financing organizations inside target countries to advance U.S. policy interests and, if needed, help in “regime change.” The secret hand behind NED’s creation was CIA Director William J. Casey who worked with senior CIA covert operation specialist Walter Raymond Jr. to establish NED in 1983. Casey – from the CIA – and Raymond – from his assignment inside President Ronald Reagan’s National Security Council – focused on creating a funding mechanism to support groups inside foreign countries that would engage in propaganda and political action that the CIA had historically organized and paid for covertly. To partially replace that CIA role, the idea emerged for a congressionally funded entity that would serve as a conduit for this money. But Casey recognized the need to hide the strings being pulled by the CIA. “Obviously we here [at CIA] should not get out front in the development of such an organization, nor should we appear to be a sponsor or advocate,” Casey said in one undated letter to then-White House counselor Edwin Meese III – as Casey urged creation of a “National Endowment.” The NED also has found itself in the middle of political destabilization campaigns against governments that have gotten on the wrong side of U.S. foreign policy. For instance, prior to the February 2014 coup in Ukraine, overthrowing elected President Viktor Yanukovych and installing an anti-Russian regime in Kiev, NED was funding scores of projects.


 International Business Times - Russia Insider - Jul 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 
Russia aumenta presença no Mar Negro, Mediterrâneo e Atlântico.
Russia on Sunday released its revised maritime doctrine, aimed at boosting the Russian navy’s strategic positions on the Black Sea, while also helping the country’s military maintain a strong presence in the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. According to officials, the move is aimed at countering NATO’s “inadmissible expansion” near the country’s western borders. A 2010 version of the doctrine also identified NATO as a major threat to Russia. However, the recent conflict in eastern Ukraine and Moscow’s alleged involvement in aiding pro-Russian rebels there have further deteriorated relations between Russia and the West. Published Sunday on the Kremlin's website, the updated doctrine focuses on “developing infrastructures” for the country’s fleet stationed in the Black Sea off the Crimean peninsula, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, Agence France-Presse (AFP)reported

"É em reação à OTAN, que: tenta assumir caráter global, e que se move para perto da Rússia".
The revised policy underlines “the inadmissible character of the Alliance's plans to move military infrastructures towards its borders,” according to a post on the Kremlin website, cited by AFP. The doctrine also called for the “accelerated reconstitution and completion of strategic Russian positions” in the Black Sea, while “guaranteeing an adequate military naval presence for Russia” in the Atlantic region. Russian President Vladimir Putin approved the amendments on Sunday, calling them a “milestone event for the future of the Navy,” Russia Today reported, adding that the updated doctrine covers four functional areas, including naval activity, maritime transport, marine science and the development of mineral resources; and six regions, including the Atlantic, the Arctic, the Pacific, the Caspian Sea, the Indian Ocean and Antarctica. “Our attention towards the Atlantic is justified by the expansion of NATO in the East,” AFP quoted Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin as saying, highlighting “the accent put on the Atlantic and the Arctic” in the revised policy. 

26 julho 2015


YouTube VIDEO - Jul 2015 - clik 1 
"Europa virou colônia controlada por banqueiros, sem lugar para democracia, mais e mais pobre".
German MP Sahra Wagenknecht: Europe is a colony controlled by banksters and with no democracy. Look at what have you done in Greece, Mrs. Angela Merkel. 


New Eastern Outlook - The Nation - Pepe Escobar - The Saker .
Jul 2015 - clik 1 clik 2 clik 3 
Grande Eurásia: China, Índia e Rússia colocam 50% do mundo fora do parasitismo do dólar.
On the ground level, this should be thought of as part of the New Great Game in Eurasia. Its flip side is the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the Pacific and the Atlantic version of the same, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, both of which Washington is trying to advance to maintain US global economic dominance. The question these conflicting plans raise is how to integrate trade and commerce across that vast region. From the Chinese and Russian perspectives, Eurasia is to be integrated via a complex network of superhighways, high-speed rail lines, ports, airports, pipelines, and fiber optic cables. By land, sea, and air, the resulting New Silk Roads are meant to create an economic version of the Pentagon’s doctrine of “Full Spectrum Dominance”—a vision that already has Chinese corporate executives crisscrossing Eurasia sealing infrastructure deals. 
As the EEU has begun establishing free trade zones with India, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt, and Latin America’s Mercosur bloc (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela), the initial stages of this integration process already reach beyond Eurasia. Meanwhile, the SCO, which began as little more than a security forum, is expanding and moving into the field of economic cooperation. Its countries, especially four Central Asian “stans” (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan) will rely ever more on the Chinese-driven Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the NDB. At Ufa, India and Pakistan finalized an upgrading process in which they have moved from observers to members of the SCO. This makes it an alternative G8. Central Asia is, at the moment, geographic ground zero for the convergence of the economic urges of China, Russia, and India. It was no happenstance that, on his way to Ufa, Prime Minister Modi stopped off in Central Asia. Like the Chinese leadership in Beijing, Moscow looks forward (as a recent documentputs it) to the “interpenetration and integration of the EEU and the Silk Road Economic Belt” into a “Greater Eurasia” and a “steady, developing, safe common neighborhood” for both Russia and China.
EUA e Ocidente, irrelevantes para 3 bilhões de pessoas: PIB 16 tri.
Notably, the BRICS final declaration also pledged greater cooperation on combating terrorism and dealing with security problems of member states. This overlaps the Russia-initiated Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), created in 1992 after the collapse of the Soviet Union to provide some semblance of security from rampant CIA monkey business using veterans of the CIA’s Afghani Mujahideen to “stir up” (to use Brzezinski’s term for it) the peoples of former Soviet states with large Muslim populations across Central Asia, especially Azerbaijan and the Caucasus. Today, the CSTO is emerging as a far more serious organization and a means by which Russia can legitimately provide direct security expertise to weaker states inside the Eurasian Economic Union such as Kyrgyzstan or Armenia, both of whom have been targets of new US-sponsored Color Revolutions to spread chaos across the emerging Eurasian economic space. 
What is notable about the joint BRICS-SCO-Eurasian Economic Union summit hosted by Russia’s Putin in Ufa, a city of some one million at the foot of the Ural mountain range near to Kazakhstan, is not only the degree of harmonizing that is taking place among the three vast organizations. It is also the fact that Russia uniquely is a member of all three, facilitating the harmonization of the three in terms of strategic goals. Moreover the member states have everything and everyone necessary to be fully independent of the dollar world and the dying EU with its misbegotten Euro sham. As The Saker pointed out in a recent perceptive piece, “the full list of BRICS/SCO members will now look like this: Brazil , China , India , Kazakhstan , Kyrgyzstan , Pakistan , Russia , South Africa , Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The BRICS/SCO will thus include 2 Permanent UN Security Council, 4 countries with nuclear weapons (only 3 NATO countries have nukes!), it’s members account for a full third of the world’s land area: they produce 16 trillion dollars in GDP and have a population of 3 billion people or half of the global world population.” A new architecture of Eurasia is being formed, something which, were they of a mind to, the nations of the EU, above all Germany, France, Italy, could hugely benefit from cooperating with. Yet, what is the response of Washington and her “vassals” in European NATO, to use the term of Brzezinski?
China e Rússia em profunda simbiose, criam um mega-país jamais imaginado na história.
The core of this alternative New World Order are, of course, Russia and China. Without them, neither the BRICS nor the SCO would make any sense. The most amazing feature of this Russian-Chinese ‘core’ is the way it was formed. Rather than creating a formal alliance, Putin and Xi did something which, as far as I know, has never been done in the past: they have turned their two super-countries (or ex-empires, pick your term) into symbionts, two separate organisms which fully depend on each other. China has agreed to become fully dependent on Russia for energy and high technology (especially defense and space) while Russia has agreed to become fully dependent on China economically. It is precisely because China and Russia are so different from each other that they form the perfect match, like two puzzle figures, who perfectly fit each other. For centuries the Anglo-Saxons have feared the unification of the European landmass as a result of a Russian-German alliance, and they have been very successful at preventing it. For centuries the major sea powers have ruled the world. But what no western geostrategist had ever envisioned is the possibility that Russia would simple turn East and agree to a symbiotic relationship with China. The sheer size of what I call the Russian-Chinese Strategic Partnership (RCSP) makes not only German, but even all of Europe basically irrelevant. In fact, the AngloZionist Empire simply does not have the means to influence this dynamic in any significant way. 
Had Russia and China signed some kind of formal alliance, there would always have been the possibility for either country to change course, but once a symbiosis is created, the two symbionts become inseparable, joined not only at the hip, but also at the heart and lungs (even if they each keep their own separate “brains”, i.e. governments). What is so attractive to the rest of the world in this BRICS/SCO alternative is that neither Russia nor China have any imperial ambitions. Both of these countries have been empires in the past, and both have paid a huge price for that imperial status. Furthermore, they both have carefully observed how the USA has arrogantly overstretched itself over the entire planet resulting in a dialectical anti-American reaction worldwide. While the White House and the corporate media keep scaring those still willing to listen to them with tales about the “resurgent Russia” and the “assertive China”, the reality is that neither of these two countries has any desire at all to replace the USA as the world hegemon. You will never see China or Russia covering the globe with 700+ military bases, or fighting elective wars on a yearly basis or spend more on “defense” (i.e. aggression) than the rest of the planet combined. They will not built a 600 ship navy or even a fleet of 12 aircraft carriers to “project power” worldwide. And they will most definitely not point a “space gun” at the entire planet with megalomaniacal projects such aPrompt Global StrikeWhat Russia, China and the BRICS/SCO countries want is an international order in which security is truly collective, according to the principle that “if you feel threatened then I am not safe”. They want a cooperative order in which countries are allowed (and even encouraged) to follow their own societal development model. Iran, for example, will not have to cease being an Islamic Republic after joining the SCO. They want to get rid of the comprador elites whose loyalty lies with foreign interests and encourage the “sovereignization “of each country. Finally, they want an international order ruled by the rule of law and not by the “might makes right” principle which has been the hallmark of the European civilization since the Crusades. And the key thing to understand is this: they don’t want that because they are so kind and noble, but because they sincerely perceive this to be in their pragmatic self-interest. 


YouTube VIDEO - Jul 2015 - clik 1 
DOCUMENTÁRIO: Ocidente tenta em vão acobertar Kiev. Derrubou vôo MH-17 com 297 pessoas.
It is now quite clear that the Ukrainians shot the plane down, possibly in collusion with Western intelligence agencies.  The orchestrated media campaign unleashed after the incident is damning enough on its own, and will rank as one of the most shameful media shams of all time - Goebbels, William Randolph Hearst, and the Spanish-American war included.

25 julho 2015


YouTube VIDEO - Jul 2015 - clik1 clik2 clik3 clik4 clik5 clik6 clik7 clik8 
"Mundo está furioso com EUA: turbinam homossexualidade, são líderes globais da depravação".
Right Wing Watch reports on the extreme rhetoric and activities of key right-wing figures and organizations by showing their views in their own words. In this video, Sam Rohrer of the American Pastors Network says America is now a "purveyor of evil" while Russia is "the protector of moral truth."

EUA nomeiam 1° embaixador mundial da agenda homossexual
Os Estados Unidos estão nomeando seu primeiro embaixador internacional de direitos homossexuais. Esse é um evento histórico, pois nenhuma nação, nem mesmo a ONU, jamais nomeou um embaixador homossexual para promover direitos homossexuais mundiais. Mas agora, com o governo dos EUA escolhendo fortemente ficar do lado dos ativistas homossexuais internacionais, eles receberão mais treinamento e financiamento para avançar e ameaçar, e cristãos como eu correm o risco de serem rotulados de “violadores de direitos humanos” e “criminosos.” Os EUA, que foram fundados por homens que acreditavam na Bíblia, estão determinados a desafiar as convicções cristãs deles, inclusive a crença deles de que Deus destruiu Sodoma por causa de seus pecados homossexuais.George Washington, por exemplo, via a conduta homossexual como abominável e detestável. Mas a atual América, uma superpotência, acha que é maior do que Washington e do que o Deus que castigou o pecado homossexual de Sodoma. 
E uma presença maior do Partido Republicano no Senado e Câmara dos Deputados nos EUA não aumentou a oposição a essa ameaça nacional e internacional. Vendo o avanço implacável da agenda gay nos EUA, vários grandes líderes evangélicos americanos estão investindo na propagação da resistência em outros países. Recentemente, a Campanha pelos Direitos Humanos (CDH), que é o maior grupo homossexualista americano, publicou um relatório intitulado “Exportação de Ódio,” denunciando líderes cristãos americanos que, em contrariedade à política externa oficial dos EUA que promove a agenda gay no mundo inteiro, estão promovendo uma resistência mundial a essa agenda. É claro que quando o próprio Mal diz que é “Exportação de Ódio” é exatamente o contrário. A real “Exportação de Ódio” — ódio pela família, crianças e cristãos — é o governo dos EUA financiando o ativismo homossexual no mundo inteiro. Tenho saudades dos dias em que a maior exportação dos EUA eram o Evangelho de Jesus Cristo, com a bênção do governo americano. Hoje, é a sodomia… Não é de admirar que Billy Graham tenha dito: “Os EUA são tão maus quanto Sodoma e Gomorra.” E muitas vezes ele menciona: “Se Deus não castigar os Estados Unidos, Ele terá de pedir perdão para Sodoma e Gomorra”. O lugar número 1 do relatório da CDH ficou para o Rev. Scott Lively, autor livro “Pink Swastika,” que tem se destacado por inspirar os russos a assumir uma firme postura contra as políticas homossexualistas do Ocidente. O relatório também aponta que além da Rússia, ele também viaja para Uganda, Europa Oriental e Inglaterra.
Euro decadência é gritante: condescendente com pedofilia.
Russian media report on Dutch paedophile party and power of paedophile lobby within Dutch establishment

Decadência britânica: infestação de pedófilos na aristocracia e na mais alta elite, a família real.
A 'powerful elite' of at least 20 prominent establishment figures formed a VIP paedophile ring that abused children for decades, a whistleblower claimed today. Peter McKelvie - the former child protection officer who first raised the alarm about high profile individuals engaged in child sex abuse - said senior politicians, military figures and even people linked to the Royal Family are among the alleged abusers. Mr Kelvie said that their campaign of abuse may have been going on for as long as 65 years but 'there has always been the block and the cover-up and the collusion to prevent an investigation.' Speaking in public for the first time in 20 years, Mr McKelvie, whose claims led to Scotland Yard's 2012 Operation Fernbridge investigation into allegations of a paedophile network linked to Downing Street, said the alleged VIP child abuse ring may at last face justice, although several members may be dead.

Enorme lista atinge elite,  juizes cobrem abusos e assassinatos.
- Five suspected child abusers with the former MP Cyril Smith. see here
MI5 hid child abuse at boys’ home see here
London VIP paedophile ring - with very powerful figures. see here
Liberal party offered “hush money” to cover up for Cyril Smith see here
Former MP Harvey Proctor faces allegations of paedophilia see here
Lord Bramall investigated by police about paedophile ring claims see here
Three boys murdered by Westminster VIP paedophile ring see here
- A report into VIP peadophile Jimmy Savile see here
House of Commons speaker, George Thomas, accused of child abuse see here
- An investigation into historic child abuse on the island of Jersey see here
Home Office Secretary, Leon Brittan, opposed banning anti-Paedophile Law see here
High profile ex-politician faces claims that he raped a girl in the woods see here
Thatcher blocked : strip paedophile Sir Peter Hayman of his knighthood see here
Top Tory MP escaped prosecution for child sex abuse see here
Victim of 1970s Dolphin Square VIP paedophile ring tells of senior Tories see here
-  The former home secretary Lord Brittan with raping a young woman. see here
- Janner Criticized justice system for excusing alleged Nazi war criminal see here
- Child abuse case against Lord Janner dropped for a second time see here
- Lord Janner - not charged with 22 child sex offenses due to dementia see here
- Westminster paedophile ring murdered three boys in 70s & 80s see here
- Home office chiefs were told of child sex claims in a 1995 report. see here
- Janner to detective who was forced to drop paedophile case against him see here
-  Proof to charge Lord Janner for paedophilia 20 years ago see here
- Thatcher knew on child abuse at Kincora but she  ignored it. see here
- Labour peer Lord Janner over child sex claims see here
- More than 1,400 men – including 261 high-profile guys – on child abuse see here
- Security services likely covered for Cyril Smith. MI5 involvement. see here
- Scotland police investigating Lord Janner ‘70s peadophile claim see here
- Rock star, Scorpions bassist, people are killedsee here
- Influential paedophiles was the head of a Masonic lodge, GCHQ spies see here
- A ring of Judges protected Janner from child sex inquiry see here
- CPS refuses to advise police - child abuser Greville Janner see here
- Lord Janner’s freemason police chief friend - molest young boys see here
- Lord Janner voted 203 times in Parliament despite dementia see here
- Peter Mandleson lobbied Blair to give Janner a peerage AFTER sex abuse claims see here
- Lord Janner’s son attended elite school where children were abused by teachers see here
- Lord Janner ‘violated, raped and tortured’ children in parliament, claims MP see here
- Nearly 80 MPs think Lord Janner should be prosecuted see here
- One year - Inquiry - not one single witness has been questioned see here
- Northern Ireland - paedophile with links to former government advisor. see here
- Two MPs report - child sex abuse and corruption see here
- William Hague ordered an inquiry - nothing was done. see here
- VIP Paedophile victims speak out in Australian documentary news see here
- Leon Brittan “a regular” -  abuse survivor see here
- Lord Mountbatten, along with Mi6 chief and Anthony Blunt. see here
- Sir Leon Brittan - VIP paedophile ring. see here
- Lord Armstrong - sexually abusing children. see here
- Police sabotaged investigation - London Paedophile ring see here
- Leon Brittan - implicated a colleague of Brittan’s. see here
- Ted Heath was a paedophile come to light as police investigate see here
- Ex-Lord Mayor of Westminster alleged to have attended paedophile parties see here 
- Leon Brittan and other VIPs implicated in newly released files see here

20 julho 2015


The Fourth Media - Jul 2015 - clik 1 
Europa em alarme, neo-nazistas da Ucrânia, ameaça vai sobrar: Polônia, Rep Checa, Hungria.
After the recent firefight between Right Sector militants and the police in Mukacheve, Ukraine’s neighbors are taking steps to beef up their own security. Slovaks have strengthened the forces protecting their borders, fearing that armed militants from Ukraine might cross into their country. The Polish media has reported with alarm that Ukrainian battles are taking place only 60 km. from the nearest Polish village of Ustrzyki Górne, and the press is asking if the Polish government is doing anything to prevent fugitive militants from entering Poland. Polish officials are silent for now, not wanting to cast their Ukrainian ally in an unfavorable light, despite bombings at police stations in Lviv, only 80 km. from the Polish border. And it is only 90 km. to the Polish town of Przemyśl, where radicals from the Union of Ukrainians in Poland are based, who make no effort to hide their roots in the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists-Ukrainian Insurgent Army, their sympathy for Right Sector, or their wish to turn Przemyśl into a center for Ukrainian nationalism in Poland. 
Czech President Miloš Zeman has stated that a flood of refugees should be expected, fleeing events in Ukraine, and the hour may very well be approaching when the Czech army will have to defend the state’s borders from an unchecked influx of migrantsThe Czech police are looking for the owners of cars with Czech license plates that were seen transporting Right Sector militants in the Ukrainian city of Mukacheve, and local Ukrainian nationalists have made threats against prominent Ruthenian figures living in the Czech Republic, so there can be no question that Ukrainian nationalist activists are already present in the Czech Republic. János Lázár, the head of the Hungarian prime minister’s office, has noted the dramatic deterioration of security in Eastern Europe. He acknowledged that Hungarian intelligence is working in Transcarpathia to protect ethnic Hungarians, against the wishes of the government in Kiev. After the events in Mukacheve, Ukrainian experts are seriously considering the possibility that the Peoples Republic of Transcarpathia might make an appearance in the region (Gen. Vladimir Ruban, the director of the Center for Prisoner Exchange, has suggested such a scenario), as well as units of Hungarian self-defense forces. The Hungarian self-defense forces were mentioned for the first time in March 2014, when the Party of Hungarians of Ukraine, led by Miklós Kovács, proclaimed its determination to protect Transcarpathian Hungarians from the supporters of Euromaidan. Such measures turned out to be unnecessary at the time, but the risk still exists. Ukrainian «Nazis» regularly threaten Hungarians. The most recent example was the vow made by Carpathian Sich militants to kill Hungarian politicians for their «anti-Ukrainian activities.» 


Counterpunch - The Fourth Media - Jul 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
BRICS erguem-se contra domínio dos EUA - que assiste impotente - criam mundo fora do seu alcance.
“China and Russia have described BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) as the core of a new international order… Russian President Vladimir Putin said… “There is no doubt — we have all necessary premises to expand the horizons of mutually beneficial cooperation, to join together our raw material resources, human capital and huge consumer markets for a powerful economic spurt.” Russia’s Tass news agency also quoted Mr. Putin as saying that the Eurasian continent had vast transit potential. He pointed to “the construction of new efficient transport and logistics chains, in particular, the implementation of the initiative of the Silk Road economic belt and the development of transportation in the eastern part of Russia and Siberia. 
This may link the rapidly growing markets in Asia and Europe’s economies, mature, rich in industrial and technological achievements. At the same time, this will allow our countries to become more commercially viable in the competition for investors, for creating new jobs, for advanced enterprises,” he observed.”…. The summit also acknowledged “the potential for expanding the use of our national currencies in transactions between the BRICS countries.” (“BRICS, SCO, EAEU can define new world order: China, Russia“, The Hindu) . The dollar is toast. The IMF is toast. The US debt market (US Treasuries) is toast. The institutions that support US power are crumbling before our very eyes. The BRICS have had enough; enough war, enough Wall Street, enough meddling and hypocrisy and austerity and lecturing. This is farewell. Sure, it will take time, but Ufa marks a fundamental change in thinking, a fundamental change in approach, and a fundamental change in strategic orientation. The BRICS are not coming back, they’re gone for good, just as Washington’s “pivot to Asia” is gone for good. There’s just too much resistance. Washington has simply overplayed its hand, worn out its welcome. People are sick of us. 


The Fourth Media - Jul 2015 - clik 1 
Ascende Eurásia, decai Ocidente.
The one superpower dominated world is becoming a thing of the past right in front of our eyes. Old international institutions are in decline, take the World Trade Organization (WTO), the European Union (EU) mired in crisis, or the degrading Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). So far, intense discussions of United Nations Organization reform have been nothing but shooting the breeze. The United States has already seen its heyday. It is still going strong with its military, economic and political potential but there are other states breathing down its neck. China has surpassed the US in terms of GDP based on purchasing power parity (PPP). The cooperation among BRICS members is on the rise. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization is expanding with India and Pakistan on the way to membership. Greece, the homeland of democracy, has become the weakest link of the European Union. 
This fact serves to emphasize the degeneration of the Western democracies with their same-sex marriages and shaky foundations the national states are built on. The United States starts to look more like a World War II battle ship with a large hole in the hull below the waterline. The damage is not visible, the ship continues to move with it formidable guns aimed at the enemy. But as time goes by the battle ship is losing speed and starts to go down. The melting pot that was so much spoken of during the days of Bill Clinton’s tenure is not that effective anymore, the United States has failed to become a united nation and the time approaches when the Anglo-Saxons don’t have to shoulder the “White Man’s burden» anymore with Latinos taking over as the dominant group. When it happens, the United States will become a different country with different culture and, perhaps, different goals to pursue. Today the United States is retreating to leave behind hotbeds of tension and unfinished wars. The armed conflict in Ukraine, the never ending war in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Iraq in ruins – that’s what the retreat results in. To slow down the process of degradation the United States is applying efforts to create the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) bringing together the golden bullion states as part of financial International. But this the time when “new right» and “new left» in Europe are gaining strength to insert significant changes into the plans of Washington and the financial International mentioned above. 
They can either try to create a new system to unite nations, or go back to the idea of common security space from Lisbon to Vladivostok. The United States is considering the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership as a project aimed at cutting Europe off from Russia and pushing the Russian Federation deeper into Asia. The US shies away from using the term Cold War in regard to the current psychological and informational stand-off but, actually, it is waging such a war on all fronts. This affirmation is confirmed by increasing the strength and capacity of the NATO Response Force, returning US Army units to Europe, stationing forces in the countries which share borders with the Russian Federation, deploying missile defense elements in Europe, and launching debates to review the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said in early June that the United Kingdom could site American new nuclear missiles on British soil amid heightened tensions with Russia. There is no end in sight to the smouldering conflict in Ukraine. No matter all the attempts to restore peace (the Normandy Four, the mission of Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) there is a danger of sparking a big war with the United States stepping in one more time as a “European savior». At the same time NATO forces would be deployed along the Russian border from the Baltics to the Black Sea. This scenario is still imminent. If the United States says “yes» to Ukraine joining NATO the situation will inevitably exacerbate further. 


Sputnik News - The Fourth Media - Jul 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
Rússia e China contra-balançam poder dos EUA com BRICS e SCO.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the BRICS have transformed into two influential political organizations with the prospect of becoming an alternative to the US-led global system, according to Stratfor. “Ultimately, both forums enable Russia and China to promote their individual regional interests and their combined interest in countering US dominance in the international system,” Stratfor’s analysts pointed out. The analysts stressed that while Beijing has steered the SCO “toward an economic grouping,” Moscow has highlighted the forum’s “political role” and “pushed for greater security cooperation.” Furthermore, after including India and Pakistan into the SCO, the expanded organization may create an economic space that could “theoretically” compete with the EU and the US, diminishing their economic leverage, namely sanctions and the dollar-dominated oil market. On the other hand, the BRICS has been established to use an opportunity of shifting global economic and investment interests with the prospect to become a viable alternative to the US-led global financial architecture. The analysts noted that regardless of certain economic obstacles faced by the emerging powers of BRICS over the recent decade, the group makes up to 20-30 percent of global GDP. 
Meanwhile, “[w]ith the crisis in the Eurozone, instability in Ukraine and disputes in the South China Sea, Moscow and Beijing see both a need and an opportunity to erode US influence by building on their respective strengths through cooperation,” the Stratfor report stated. The analysts also pointed to the fact that the BRICS members have launched the New Development Bank with an initial capitalization of $100 billion. “Beijing sees the BRICS bank as yet another tool, along with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, to pick away at the US-dominated financial system. With its financial system relatively isolated from the West because of sanctions, Moscow sees the development of alternative institutions as imperative at this time,” the Stratfor report elaborated. It should be noted that Western experts admit that the latest summit in Ufa has obviously marked the transformation of the old world order into a new multi-polar reality. “The BRICS will now be bolstered by their own institutions that are intended to operate parallel to the US-led order created at Bretton Woods in 1944,” Cynthia Roberts, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Hunter College, CUNY (City University of New York) pointed out. The West is anxiously watching the gradual development of the SCO and BRICS into “more meaningful” organizations, while Sino-Russian ties are strengthening and eliminating the last remnants of distrust. 


The Fourth Media - Strategic Culture Foundation - Jul 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
Surge a Nova Ordem: mundo não é mais dominado pelo Ocidente. Afastar-se do dólar parasita.
The tide is changing. The world is no longer dominated by the US, Western Europe, and Japan. The Group of Eight (G8), which reverted to the Group of Seven (G7) in 2014, has been displaced by the BRICS, which is why Russia was not bothered when it was expelled from the G8/G7 talk shop by the US, Germany, Japan, Canada, Britain, France, and Italy. Across the globe, businesses and governments anticipate the normalization of trade with Iran, with or without a final nuclear agreement between Tehran and the Permanent 5+1 (or the EU3+3). The BRICS has begun to institutionalize itself and move beyond the stage of being a coordinating forum for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. China’s New Silk Road has gained traction while the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) became a reality in January 2015. 
Plus, after fifteen years, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is expanding. Eurasia is integrating and forming the nucleus of an alternative and rival world order. This has the policymakers in the Washington Beltway worried. While the prevented Ukraine from joining the EEU, the US and its allies did everything to undermine and mock the EEU when it was launched by Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Despite this, even before the Eurasian Economic Union’s first birthday, the EEU has made headway. It has already started the process of establishing free trade zones with Vietnam, Egypt, India, Iran, and South America’s Southern Common Market (Mercosur / Mercosul). Mercosur consists of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela. Nor has the US succeeded in isolating Cuba, Iran, Syria, or Russia. Washington has failed to bring about regime change in Syria and US officials have had to sit down at the negotiating table with both the Iranians and the Cubans. Instead the US has been isolating itself. 


YouTube VIDEO - Jul 2015 - clik 1 
BRICS prontos à desdolarização.
Reduzir o parasitismo indevido.
Dólar contém taxa de confisco.


YouTube VIDEO - Reuters - Global Research - R.T. News .
Jul 2015 - clik 1 clik 2 clik 3 clik 4 clik 5 clik 6 
Berlin já dobra compra de gás russo, e daí aniquila efeitos das sanções anti-Rússia dos EUA.
The two parts of the new Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline will be operational by the end of 2019, said Gazprom CEO Aleksey Miller. Gazprom expects Germany’s BASF subsidiary Wintershall to join the project in September. "We will use the know-how Nord Stream accumulated during construction and operation of the Nord Stream-1 pipeline. The successful track record on the Baltic Sea will help us to optimize construction costs and timeframe. Both pipelines of the Nord Stream-2 project will be put into operation by 2019 year-end," Miller said Friday at the annual meeting of shareholders. A joint company will be established in the near future, he added. The Russian gas monopoly would retain a 51 percent stake in the project.Partners with Gazprom will each receive a 9-15 percent share.The project's route is expected to follow the 1,224 kilometers of Nord Stream which opened in 2010. Nord Stream targets markets in Germany, France and the UK, and other EU countries. 

“Building new transport infrastructure along the shortest route connecting the gas fields in the north of Russia and the markets of Europe will improve the safety and reliability of supplies under new contracts,” said Miller. Gazprom does not need the approval of the European Commission to begin construction, he added. Gazprom signed a memorandum of intent to cooperate on the new gas pipeline project via the Baltic Sea with Germany’s E.ON, Royal Dutch Shell and OMV of Austria at the 2015 St. Petersburg Economic Forum (SPIEF) last week. The new gas project was dubbed Nord Stream -2, as the route will be 86 percent the same as the route of the Nord Stream pipeline, RIA Novosti reported Thursday quoting NS technical director, Sergey Serdyukov. The parties intend to build two gas pipelines off the coast of Russia through the Baltic Sea to the German coast. It will provide direct gas supplies of up to 55 billion cubic meters a year to European customers. 

19 julho 2015


Paul Craig Roberts - Jul 2015 - clik 1 
Combalido, EUA faz paz com Irã: ter folga, encarar Rússia e China.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Washington has grown accustomed to being the Uni-Power, able to exercise its will unchallenged in the world. The rise of Russian strength under Putin and Chinese strength under the new policy has destroyed Washington’s Uni-Power privilege. Washington wants the privilege back. Washington is not in good shape, economically or militarily. According to Nobel Economist Joseph Stieglitz and Harvard University budget expert Linda Bilmes, Washington has wasted at least $6 trillion dollars in its 14-year old wars in the Middle East. Despite the extraordinary cost, Washington has been defeated, and is now faced with the Islamic State, a new entity arising out of Washington’s mistakes that is creating a new country partly out of Iraq and partly out of Syria. 
Despite its gigantic hubris, Washington has figured out that the US cannot simultaneously take on Russia, China, Iran, and the Islamic State. This realization is one reason for the nuclear agreement with Iran. It removes Iran from the mix. A second reason for the agreement is that Iran is opposed to the Islamic State and can be employed as an American proxy against the Islamic State, thus freeing Washington for conflict with Russia and China. A third reason for Washington’s agreement with Iran is Washington’s concern with Europe’s energy dependence on Russia. This dependence is inconsistent with the EU going along with Washington’s sanctions against Russia and with NATO’s military moves against Russia. Washington wants to end this dependence and has hopes that money can bring Iran into becoming a supplier of natural gas and oil to Europe. The explanation I have provided is realism, not cynicism. All that the agreement with Iran means is that Washington has belatedly realized that the concocted Iranian and Muslim threats are using up time, energy, and resources that Washington needs to apply to Russia and China. Moreover, there were too many threats for the American people to know which was paramount. 
EUA não poderia vencer um Irã forte, apoiado por China e Rússia.
The US had no reliable options left. Despite the hawkish «all options are on the table» rhetoric from the Washington Beltway, a war with Iran was understood to cost too much and to be far too risky. If the US could have militarily attacked Iran, it would have done it like it did to Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. This has been stated publicly by Iranian military commanders, which say that they know that Tehran was the main US target for the Bush II Administration. [2] Thus the Bush II slogan: «Anyone can go to Baghdad, but real men go to Tehran!» Any attack on Iran would lead to a highly unpopular regional war in the Middle East that would have devastating political, social, economic, security, strategic, and diplomatic results for Washington. In one way or another, a war with Tehran would cripple the U.S. in the Middle East and demote it as a world power. U.S. war games simulating an invasion of Iran even assessed major losses for Washington. [3] A June 2015 report published by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment even confirms this by saying that the US does not have the proper military arsenal for conventionally attacking Iran, because the Pentagon cannot launch a long-range assault. [4] According to the report, the Pentagon is primed for short-range direct strikes whereas the Iranians, like the Chinese and the Russians, have long-range defensive systems that prevent the US from getting close enough for an attack. [5] Nor were and are there any guarantees that any possible war with Iran would not spill outside the borders of the Middle East and Central Asia or that such a conflict would not transform into a broader international war. In this context, Washington had no guarantees that the Russians and the Chinese would not intervene to help the Iranians against a US attack. Moreover, as the US and EU increasingly come into confrontation with Russia and the US increasingly comes into confrontation with the Chinese, Washington and its EU allies need rapprochement with Iran to reduce, at least temporarily, their hostilities on one front.
EUA, Irã e o Século da Eurásia.
If Beijing and Moscow totally annulled their partial commitments to the sanctions system, the US was uncertain if the corporations and governments of the EU and Asia-Pacific would have continued with the US-led sanctions system. The reaction of US allies after the Lausanne Agreement says a lot in this regard. After the Lausanne Agreement, business leaders and trade officials from Asia, Europe, and the rest of the world began making trips to Iran in anticipation of the reopening of the larger Iranian market. Executives from the Anglo-Dutch energy giant Royal Dutch Shell and the Italian energy giant Eni even travelled to Tehran. [6] While European and Asian corporations were rushing to Iran prepare for the normalization of trade, the French ambassador to the US, Gerard Araud, told the hawks opposing a nuclear deal with Iran at the Atlantic Council think-tank to calm down about European businesses rushing to restart trade with Iran. [7] «Really, we lost a lot of money, not the Americans», he reminded the Atlantic Council. [8] With the Russian and Chinese challenge being posed against the US dollar and Bretton Woods system with the creation of a rival financial global architecture with the BRICS News Development Bank (NDB) and China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), it is clear that the financial and banking sanctions the US put into place would have also eroded away. As global circumstances changed and Eurasian integration accelerated, it was the US that wanted a final deal in Vienna more than Iran.