PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - Global Research - Sputnik News - R.T. News .
- Oct 2015 - clik1 clik2 clik3 clik4 clik5 clik6 
"Mostrem provas, ou neguem o que alegam" exige Rússia, já sob ataque de guerra de informações.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has summoned military attaches of NATO countries and Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, asking the officials to clarify their countries' allegations that Russian airstrikes in Syria have hit civilian targets. "Today we invited military attaches from the US, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the NATO bloc to ask them to give official validation to their statements, or make a rebuttal," Defense Ministry deputy head Anatoly Antonov said on Tuesday. It particularly touches upon Western media's "outrageous accusations" that the Russian Air Force has allegedly bombed hospitals in Syria, the military official said. Information attacks on Moscow's anti-terror efforts in the region have intensified recently, Antonov said, adding that the Russian military is "blamed not only for conducting airstrikes on the 'moderate opposition,' but also on civilian buildings, such as hospitals, mosques and schools."

The MoD official stressed that such blame is put upon Russia not only by the media, but also officials and politicians from a number of Western states, including US Secretary of State John Kerry, US Department of Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, the UK's Defense Secretary Michael Fallon and France's Minister of Defense Jean-Yves Le Drian. Allegations will be dismissed as baseless should Russia not receive proof in the next following days, Antonov said, adding that the Defense Ministry "closely monitors and analyzes such statements." The MoD deputy head once again called on foreign military officials to join efforts in fighting Islamic State, saying that a wider international coalition should be immediately formed to defeat terrorists in the region. "We are still waiting... for cooperation in defining concrete targets to be bombed in order to annihilate ISIS bases, or [providing] coordinates of facilities that should not be targeted by the Russian Air Force," Antonov said.

Depois aflora a verdade: sequer existem os tais alegados alvos. 
EUA nem sabe os seus enderêços.

The Russian Defense Ministry has denied media reports its aircraft hit hospitals in Syria, saying the medical facilities mentioned by Western media don’t actually exist. The Defense Ministry has checked the data presented in recent media reports, which blamed Russian aviation for hitting several hospitals in Syria, Major-General Igor Konashenkov, the ministry spokesman said in a press briefing on Monday. Konashenkov denied the accusations, which he said were "traditionally made without any proof, without any factual backing.” Out of six hospitals that were mentioned in the reports, only one medical facility actually exists in real life, he added. "We’ve checked this information. It turned out that, a hospital is only present in the village Sarmin,” the spokesman said, adding that there are no hospitals and no medical workers in the other five villages named in media reports. The Defense Ministry presented a photo of the Sarmin hospital, which was taken on October 31 after the reports emerged. The image showed the building was intact, disproving claims it had been completely destroyed and 12 people killed.

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

Land Destroyer - New Eastern Outlook - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
Já começou: EUA invade a Síria.

October 31, 2015 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - As previously warned about in June of 2015, the United States has announced that it will officially begin ground operations in Syria through the use of special forces. The Washington Post in its article, "Obama seeks to intensify operations in Syria with Special Ops troops,"would report that:  President Obama is sending a small number of Special Operations troops to northern Syria, marking the first full-time deployment of U.S. forces to the chaotic country.  The mission marks a major shift for Obama, whose determination to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has been balanced by an abiding worry that U.S. troops not be pulled too deeply into the in­trac­table Syrian conflict.  The latest deployment will involve fewer than 50 Special Operations advisers, who will work with resistance forces battling the Islamic State in northern Syria but will not engage in direct combat, Obama administration officials said.

Admission of Special Forces in Syria is Just the Beginning 

While the US claims this move is to "defeat the Islamic State (ISIS)," it is instead clearly a move to establish long-sought "buffer zones" or "safe zones" in Syria where the Syrian government can no longer operate. US airpower will also undoubtedly be used to cover these special forces, creating a defacto no-fly-zone wherever they operate. The map accompanying the Washington Post article clearly shows ISIS territory straddling the last remaining supply corridor being used to supply the terror group as well as others including Al Qaeda's al Nusra Front from NATO-member Turkey's territory. US special forces will likely begin operating in these areas, and zones carved out as US operations expand. The eventual outcome, if these operations are successful, will be the division and destruction of Syria as a nation-state. This is more than mere speculation - this is a conclusion drawn by signed and dated policy papers produced by the Brookings Institution, who has called for such zones since as early as 2012, but under different contrived pretexts.

In the March 2012 Brookings Institution"Middle East Memo #21" "Assessing Options for Regime Change" it is stated specifically (emphasis added): An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan’s leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts.More recently, in a June 2015 Brookings document literally titled, "Deconstructing Syria: A new strategy for America’s most hopeless war," it is stated that (emphasis added):  The idea would be to help moderate elements establish reliable safe zones within Syria once they were able. American, as well as Saudi and Turkish and British and Jordanian and other Arab forces would act in support, not only from the air but eventually on the ground via the presence of special forces as well. The approach would benefit from Syria’s open desert terrain which could allow creation of buffer zones that could be monitored for possible signs of enemy attack through a combination of technologies, patrols, and other methods that outside special forces could help Syrian local fighters set up. Were Assad foolish enough to challenge these zones, even if he somehow forced the withdrawal of the outside special forces, he would be likely to lose his air power in ensuing retaliatory strikes by outside forces, depriving his military of one of its few advantages over ISIL.Thus, he would be unlikely to do this.

Reuters - Associated Press - Israel National News - YouTube - Yahoo - Press TV - Sputnik.
Nov 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 - clik 4 - clik 5 - clik 6 

Síria rejeita: "é uma intervenção ilegal, é ato de agressão pois não há autorização do governo".

A Syrian member of parliament on Saturday blasted the United States'decision to send troops into Syria as an “act of aggression”. Speaking to The Associated Press (AP), the lawmaker, Sharif Shehadeh, said the American troops will have no effect on the ground, but Washington wants to say it is present in Syria. "What has happened to make America realize, after five years, that it should send between 30 and 50 military advisers?" asked Shehadeh, referring to the start of the country's civil war in March 2011 that has since killed more than 250,000 people. 

"When America sends ground forces into Syrian territories without an agreement with the Syrian government it becomes an intervention and aggression," he stated. "Will America allow Russian ground forces to go into America without an agreement? I think the answer is no." On Friday, President Barack Obama okayed a deployment of "fewer than 50" special operations forces in the north of Syria, in a bid to strengthen forces fighting the Islamic State (ISIS) group. Secretary of State John Kerry on Saturday refused to rule out more American commandos being sent to Syria beyond the 50 announced Friday. Speaking in the Kyrgyz capital during a tour of Central Asia, Kerry said he fully supported Obama's decision to put troops on the ground in Syria - which comes just weeks after Russia's surprising deployment in the war torn state. Asked whether he could rule out more troops being assigned to the mission, he said, "I can't predict what the future will bring when our policy is to destroy Daesh, to fight back against this evil. But I do think the president has made a judgment that I completely advocated for and concur in." 

Rússia já adverte: "É inaceitável. Sem permissão da Síria, nenhum país pode ali usar fôrça militar".

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Friday that no country could use military force in Syria without first securing the agreement of the Syrian government, the TASS news agency reported. TASS said Ryabkov was responding to a question about the prospect of the United States launching a ground operation in Syria. "The question of using military force in any form without the agreement of Damascus is for us unacceptable," it quoted him as saying.

 

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

Press TV - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
"EUA e OTAN estão ativamente engendrando uma guerra contra a Rússia - bem na fronteira".

The decision by the United States and its allies to deploy more troops and heavy weaponry onto Russia’s borders indicates that Washington is gearing up for a fight with Russia, an American journalist and political activist says. “They are clearly preparing to fight a war with Russia, and they are not only preparing to fight it at the old battle lines, but at Russia’s door, while they talk about Russia provoking,” Don DeBar said during an interview with Press TV on Thursday. He made the remarks when asked for his views on Washington’s plans to deploy up to 4,000 more forces in countries bordering with Russia. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that under one plan, roughly 800 to 1,000 soldiers will be stationed in each of the four battalions to be deployed to Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. US officials said the move was supposed to send Russian President Vladimir Putin a message about their active presence of military forces there. “It is a very bad sign, people do not generally place their army at your door unless they plan to fight a war with you,” DeBar said. 
“The problem is that most people in the country here [the US] have no idea that this is going on,” he noted. The media intentionally ignore reports that “there is this army deployed to Russia’s borders with material and manpower,” he added. A war between NATO, US and Russia “would probably spell, if not the end of humanity, the end of any possibility of a comfortable future for humanity,” the analyst concluded. Relations between the United States and Russia are at their lowest point since the end of the Cold War in 1991, largely due to the crisis in Ukraine. The ties deteriorated after US-backed forces ousted the Ukraine’s elected president Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014. The US and its allies accuse Moscow of sending troops into eastern Ukraine in support of the pro-Russian forces. Moscow has long denied involvement in Ukraine's crisis. Moscow says Washington is responsible for the escalating tension in Ukraine through sending arms in support of the Ukrainian army. 

A HEGEMONIA SOBRE TODA A TERRA :

Spiegel - Bloomberg - CNBC - Daily Mail - RT. - Intellihub.
Oct 2015 clik1 clik2 clik3 clik4 clik5 clik6
EUA já ataca Europa na surdina: "monta caravanas de refugiados, daí atiça uma crise humanitária".

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban accused billionaire investor George Soros of being a prominent member of a circle of "activists" trying to undermine European nations by supporting refugees heading to the continent from the Middle East and beyond. "His name is perhaps the strongest example of those who support anything that weakens nation states, they support everything that changes the traditional European lifestyle," Orban said in an interview on public radio Kossuth. 

"These activists who support immigrants inadvertently become part of this international human-smuggling network." Rights groups have criticized Orban for building a razor-wire fence on the border, tightening asylum laws and boosting his support among voters with anti-immigrant rhetoric. Soros, who was born in Hungary and is one of the biggest philanthropists in eastern Europe via his foundations and university, gives grants to organizations that provide legal assistance to asylum seekers. Soros said in an e-mailed statement that a six-point planpublished by his foundation helps “uphold European values” while Orban’s actions “undermine those values.” “His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle,” he said in the statement. “Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national border as the obstacle.”

Na cara dura, Soros já admite a acusação: "fronteiras dos países são obstáculos a nossos planos".

(INTELLIHUB) — For years many in the alternative media, as well as those in more conspiracy orientated right-wing circles, have attempted to expose the fact that liberal billionaire George Soros has and is funding a vast network of left-wing media outlets, activists, and social justice organizations. From providing early funding to hard left news outlets such as Salon.com to bankrollingmany of the leftists activist groups that descended on Ferguson in the wake of the Michael Brown shooting all the way to literally paying Black Lives Matter to continue to stir up racial anger, Soros seems to have his hands (and money) in everything. While some commentators have noted the ties between the ongoing European refugee crisis and the Soros run Open Society Foundation, the mainstream media as a whole has largely downplayed this connection, instead opting to shame the people of Europe and the United States into supporting what amounts to the literal destruction of their society.

Now, as multiple European countries have begun to fight back against this wholesale assault on their countries very foundation, Soros and his groups have come under attack and their response to these attacks has revealed why exactly he is funding various groups helping to facilitate the introduction of hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of Muslim “refugees”. Stunningly, in an email response given to Bloomberg, Soros literally admitted that his work and money are being put towards destroying the national borders of Europe. That’s right, Soros explicitly admitted that he sees the refugee crisis and the needs of the refugees as more important than the very identity of any country. “His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle,” Soros said in response to the comments made by Orban. “Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.” (emphasis mine) . There you have it. The wholesale destruction of each and every European nation in order to make way for millions of Muslim refugees is the stated goal and is being helped along with funding by the very man who exerts an already untold amount of influence on the mainstream left leaning media. This admission by Soros, seen in the context of his widespread support for both liberal causes throughout the world and the media that covers them, helps to explain why the media has attacked anyone who doesn’t support an unlimited numbr of refugees being allowed into their country as hateful, racist people. 

Tass - Veterans Today - Moon Alabama - Free Syrian Press - I.C.H. - Intellihub

Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 - clik 4 - clik 5 - clik 6  

EUA poupa ISIS, aí atinge civis na geração de energia: 2,5 milhões no escuro, serão mais refugiados.

MOSCOW, October 13. /TASS/. Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed bewilderment on Tuesday over the targets of US airstrikes in Syria. "On Sunday, the American aviation bombed out an electrical power plant and a transformer in Aleppo. Why have they done this? Whom have they punished there? What’s the point? Nobody knows," the president said at a meeting with the Russian government members. Saying that the United States’ airstrike targets in Aleppo were strange, the Russian president said he was certain that "Everything will become clear and fewer mistakes will be made if direct and business-like contact is established with a view to settling all the problems, including those in the financial sphere." The president touched upon the issue of misunderstanding between different countries talking of another problem - the settlement of the Ukrainian debt to Russia. "These matters should be once again discussed in a calm working atmosphere with the aim of finding a solution so that all problems are not shifted to our shoulders again," Putin said, citing as an example the statements that Russia has allegedly aimed at the "wrong" targets in Syria.

The Aleppo power plant is a 1,000 megawatt thermal plant in five units build by Mitsubishi Heavy Industry in 1995-1998. It is situated some 25 kilometers east of Aleppo city center. During the fighting around Aleppo various electricity distribution stations were damaged and electricity in parts of the cityhas become scarce and unpredictable. But the main power station had so far not been hit. The plant is in the hands of the Islamic State but there is an informal agreement between the government, which controls the distribution network, and those who hold the power generating station: T]he agreement of understanding pertains to the division of the electricity supply between the parties, whereby ISIS will receive 60% of the quota and the Syrian regime will receive 40%. Both sides will have some electricity and the civilian as well as fighters on both side will be better off than without electricity. No side has a motive to destroy that plant. But last night the U.S. coalition bombed the Aleppo thermal power plant and destroyed parts of it:  military source told SANA that warplanes of the Washington alliance violated Syrian airspace and attacked civilian infrastructure in Mare’a, Tal Sha’er, and al-Bab in Aleppo countryside on Sunday. The source added that the warplanes attacked the biggest electric power plant that feeds Aleppo city, which resulted in cutting off power from most neighborhoods in Aleppo city. Just a week ago U.S. air attacks had attacked another power station and a big distribution transformer al-Radwaniye also east of Aleppo. The electricity generation and distribution system is civil infrastructure. It is used and useful to everyone no matter what side of the conflict. 

A REAÇÃO DOS POVOS :

Der Spiegel - Sputnik - El Pais - R.T. News - Oct 2015 - clik1 clik2 clik3 clik4 clik5 
Der Spiegel: "exército russo está hoje mais poderoso do que todos os exércitos da Europa reunidos".

Der Spiegel também destacou as preocupações dos militares dos EUA, que acreditam que a Rússia seria capaz de interferir ou criar áreas de comunicações digitais que nenhum outro exército teria acesso, como também é feito no Mar Cáspio, estabelecendo as plataformas para o lançamento de mísseis. A edição alemã também ressaltou a modernização das forças nucleares, forças especiais, as unidades aéreas e a infantaria da marinha, o que vem sendo interpretado pelos analistas de defesa ocidentais como um aumento na capacidade russa de executar ações rápidas e pegar um potencial inimigo de surpresa em caso de uma intervenção na Europa Oriental e na Ásia Central. Segundo o especialista em defesa do Centro de Análise de Estratégias e Tecnologias da Rússia (CAST), Vasily Kashin, as Forças Armadas da Rússia são hoje "provavelmente mais fortes do que todos os exércitos da União Europeia em conjunto", mas seriam incapazes de lidar com um conflito com os militares dos EUA, por isso tem fortalecido sua dissuasão nuclear.

Best feature: the nuclear forces: Russia's military has been reformed but not uniformly. Some troops are still heavily dependent on old technology, another highly modern. This allows conclusions to Moscow's strategic calculation. The nuclear forces have priority. For "external threats defenses Moscow values ​​its nuclear unchanged priority" when, according to astudy by the German Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. The nuclear forces are fully equipped. The degree of modernization has there exceeded the mark of 70 percent. Similarly, well equipped: units of the air defense. Special Forces, Airborne units, Marine Infantry: Russia - built mobile units of light infantry - after the model of Western armies.They can be partially moved within 24 hours. "Spetsnaz" said special units were secretly transferred to the Crimea before the annexation, marines in autumn covered to Syria. Your equipment is "close to the NATO standards," said Mark Galeotti, a security expert at New York University. 

The Gros of fleet and army will also be better equipped, are in parts but still far from the 30 percent threshold. In it she reflects the threat, as seen by the Kremlin. Nuclear forces and air defenses are aimed at NATO. Russia's army was now "probably stronger than all EU armies together," said military expert Kashin. With the US clout but Russia can not compete and therefore sit on nuclear deterrence. Kashin keeps fears about Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania therefore unfounded: "Russia has no forces for a permanent offensive against Nato Everyone knows that.. Such a conflict would quickly pass into the nuclear phase" .The slight reaction forces on the other hand to strengthen Moscow's dominance in the post-Soviet space. Russia sees the region as its sphere of influence. That's one of the reasons for Moscow's constant protest against NATO expansion: Each new member eludes a potential access to the Kremlin.

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - C-Span - U.S. Senate Hearing - Oct 2015 - clik 1 
Senado EUA quer guerra na Síria com a Rússia para proteger seus terroristas da AlQaeda.

Depraved disciple of Mad John McCain just took crazy to a whole new level. If Mad John McCain is the most disgusting man in America (and he is), then certainly his snarling little sidekick from South Carolina Lindsey Graham is a strong second.

A HEGEMONIA SOBRE TODA A TERRA :

Veteran News Now - Reign of Terror - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
Feudalismo 2.0 está implantado.

The future of the planetary “Reign of Terror” has never been clearer. The pattern for global governance has been set into motion and operates under a model that has been used throughout much of history. The modern day version of command and control can be effectively described as Technofeudalism. The purpose of this introduction is to provide an outline of the arguments used by Steven Yates, Ph.D. The link to this significant treatise is provided below. In additionNews With Views maintains an extensive archives of Dr. Yates’ work. Invest the time to read the entire essay for a full understanding of the linkage behind Technofeudalis and the course for top down dominance. Their goal, I argued in Four Cardinal Errors, is to institute corporate controlled global governance: de facto world government, managed for private profit and for control over national governments and populations. Technofeudalism is the resulting political economy.

While preserving some of the vocabulary and outward features of market capitalism, technofeudalism has almost nothing to do with free markets, or free enterprise, as generally understood. It is about instituting whatever policies, instigating whatever wars, bringing about whatever revolutions, and causing whatever levels of misery are deemed necessary for enforced mass compliance. Its tools include both neoliberal and neoconservative ideology, artificial scarcity, education reduced to job training, and fear induction through constant pontificating about “terrorism” amidst random and often-depraved acts of violence, reducing as many as possible to a status of permanently cash-strapped, mentally paralyzed subjects — living amidst the most advanced technology in human history, but equivalent to serfs (“owned” as de facto property by “their” governments, employers, etc., as in medieval feudal systems of old). Hence, the term technofeudalism. Technofeudalism is based upon herding marginal and unneeded humans into ghettos of subsistent serfdom existence. The technocrats who administer the process of dehumanization become the executioners of civilization. Utopia for the select, built on the misery of the masses is a future not worth living. This fact is exactly the objective of the globalist. Destroying resistance through marginalizing survival rules a feudal society. However, building the achievement of a renaissance culture is based upon the liberation of the human spirit and decentralization of authority. The global elites depend on acquiesce of the masses to accept and adopt the tyrannical systems and indoctrination methods propagated by the technocratic matrix. Liberty is despised by authoritarians. Technofeudalism is the enemy of all human beings. Once armed with the knowledge of this threat, what will be the response of the populace targeted for slavery or extinction? 

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - R.T. News - clik 1 
"preocupa sim, é OTAN cada vez mais perto de nossas fronteiras, e daí com instalações militares".

The 12th annual Valdai Discussion Club meeting in Russia's Sochi has focused on international armed conflicts. Russian President Vladimir Putin is taking part in its final plenary session devoted to the crisis in the Middle East.

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - Oct 2015 - clik 1 
Stephen Cohen: "sob ameaça dos EUA, russos alí lutam pela sua própria existência como nação".

O COLAPSO DO IMPÉRIO :

ZeroHedge - Sputnik - Global Research - Albawaba - Oct 2015 clik1 clik2 clik3 clik4 
EUA sem moral, Iraque o rejeita: se volta à Rússia, e pede ataques aéreos aos terroristas dos EUA.

Meanwhile, flying missions over Iraq is the logical next step for The Kremlin in Russia’s bid to supplant the US as Mid-East superpower puppet master. One would be hard pressed to come up with a more humiliating scenario for Washington than for the US to be effectively kicked out of the country it “liberated” over a decade ago by Vladimir Putin on the excuse that try as they may (or may “not”, depending on how prone you are to conspiracy theories), the Americans are apparently not very good at fighting terror.  Just like in Syria, Russian airstrikes would be supported by Iran-backed fighters on the ground, and thanks to the IRGC’s grip over Iraqi politics, Moscow would find Baghdad very receptive to Russia’s presence in the country.  The US knows all of this of course and in an effort to get out ahead of the situation, Washington sent Gen. Joseph Dunford (chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) to Iraq this week to issue what can only be described as a petulant, childish ultimatum to PM Haider al-Abadi. “It’s either us, or the Russians,” Abadi was told, although not specifically in those terms.

ISIL militants aren't going to find a safe haven from Russian airstrikes in Iraq after the country's parliament gave Russia the green light to conduct airstrikes against ISIL targets in Iraq. "Iraq agreed with Russia, which leads the joint data center, to hit the ISIL militants heading from Syria into Iraq," al-Zameli said, highlighting the fact that the move would also cut off ISIL supply routes from Iraq into Syria, as cited by Fars. The approval comes amid security coordination between the governments of Russia, Iran, Iraq and Syria — all of which seek to destroy ISIL. The four nations launched the Baghdad Information Center to coordinate their military actions against the terrorists both in Syria and Iraq.

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - Guardian UK - Real Agenda - Oct 2015 - clik 1 clik 2 clik 3 
Rússia dedura EUA: "jogo duplo, finge combater terroristas, mas os apóia a derrubar governos".

The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, has launched a stinging attack on US policy in the Middle East, accusing Washington of backing terrorism and playing a “double game”. In a speech on Thursday at the annual gathering of the Valdai Club, a group of Russian and international analysts and politicians, Putin said the US had attempted to use terrorist groups as “a battering ram to overthrow regimes they don’t like”. He said: “It’s always hard to play a double game – to declare a fight against terrorists but at the same time try to use some of them to move the pieces on the Middle Eastern chessboard in your own favour. There’s no need to play with words and split terrorists into moderate and not moderate. I would like to know what the difference is.”

A HEGEMONIA SOBRE TODA A TERRA :

YouTube VIDEO - Oct 2015 - clik 1 
DOCUMENTÁRIO: "Como EUA e Europa tornaram Ucrânia num estado falido, cheio de fascismo".

Expulsar ou exterminar os nativos descendentes de russos.
This full length GRTV documentary looks at the fictitious land of Nulandistan that has been constructed out of Ukraine.The GRTV documentary deconstructs Nulandistan and the propaganda of the Obama Administration, the US Department of States, US officials, and their allies about the crisis in Ukraine and takes a look at their growing frustration towards the Russian media, particularly RT, for challenging their account of the events on the ground in what they have declared is an intensifying information war. The full length documentary starts by looking at the self-benefiting description of the EuroMaidan protests that US officials have used and how it has grossly diverged from reality. Then the Odessa Massacre is econstructed for audiences. The documentary then looks at the situation in East Ukraine, including the violence and referenda. The events in East Ukraine are then contrasted to the positions of US officials and Russia. This documentary shows how the reality of events in Ukraine has been been misappropriated and propagandized to support US foreign policy and to justify tensions against Russia.

A ASCENSÃO DA EURÁSIA :

Isvestia.Ru - Russia and India Report - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
Eurásia cinge defesa conjunta: Índia e Rússia preparam criar rede conjunta de satélites.

On October 20, Roscosmos is planning to propose to India the creation of a joint satellite system. The Izvestia Newspaper’s source at Roskosmos said that the basis of this proposal is the project involving the renovation of the satellite communication system Gonets (Messenger). The Gonets, a military communications system, has 13 satellites. It is expected that Dmitry Bakanov, General Director of Gonets, will be making a report on this project during a closed-door meeting of the Russian-Indian Intergovernmental Commission. The president of the company declined to comment on this information. There are plans to modify the system, if India or other BRICS countries agree to work together on this project. Roscosmos claims that these satellites will help provide fixed-link communications for remote areas. 

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3A GUERRA MUNDIAL ;

YouTube VIDEO - CNN - Oct 2015 - clik 1 
"Parar com esta guerra ilegal para derrubar governo de país soberano, apoiando terroristas".

Estamos armando nossos inimigos, criando caos como na Libia.
O pretexto é o mesmo, nós derrubamos outros governos antes .
Speaking with Wolf Blitzer on CNN, Tulsi explains why the US allying with Islamist extremists to overthrow Syrian President Assad is an illegal, counterproductive war that will cause even more human misery in the region and help ISIS and other Islamist extremists take over all of Syria. Instead of once again being distracted by trying to get rid of a secular dictator, Tulsi explains, the US must stay out of counter productive wars and focus on defeating the Islamist extremists who have declared war on America.

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - Next News Network - Zero Hedge - Oct 2015 - clik 1 clik 2 clik 3 
ALARMANTE, Rússia já adverte: "guerra nuclear é provável. EUA pensa que vence e sobrevive".

Speaking of nukes, Putin also warned that some nuclear powers seem to believe that there’s a way to take the “mutually” out of “mutually assured destruction.” That is, Putin warned against the dangers of thinking it’s possible to “win” a nuclear war. Commenting on US anti-missile shields in Europe and on the idea of MAD, Putin said the following: "We had the right to expect that work on development of US missile defense system would stop. But nothing like it happened, and it continues. This is a very dangerous scenario, harmful for all, including the United States itself. 

 The deterrent of nuclear weapons has started to lose its value, and some have even got the illusion that a real victory of one of the sides can be achieved in a global conflict, without irreversible consequences for the winner itself – if there is a winner at all.” In short, Putin is suggesting that the world may have gone crazy. The implication is that the US believes it not only has the capacity to win a war against the nations Washington habitually places on its various lists of "bad guys" (i.e. Russia, Iran, and China), but that Washington believes America can win without incurring consequences that are commensurate with the damage the US inflicts on its enemies. That, Putin believes, is a dangerous miscalculation and one that could end up endangering US citizens. So once again, this is Putin setting the narrative and jumping at every opportunity to portray Russia as a nation that's not content to "lead from behind" (as so many have recently accused the US of doing). And once again, his assessment seems remarkably sober in a world that does indeed seem to have lost its collective mind. 

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - Oriental Review - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 - 
Rússia revela mísseis estratégicos de superioridade. Kalibr tornam defesas inúteis: rota imprevisível.

Last week the biggest event that took place in Syria as part of Operation Hmeymim was the use by the Russian Navy’s Caspian Flotilla of 26 seaborne land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs) that hit 11 Daesh and Jabhat al-Nusra military targets inside Syria, which were located about 1,500 km. away from the missile launch site: A massive blow using Kalibr-NK LACMs was struck from the southwestern Caspian Sea. The objects of the attack were factories producing shells and explosives; command posts; ammunition, weapon, and fuel depots; and terrorist training camps in the Syrian Governorates of Raqqa, Aleppo, and Idlib. The cruise missiles, with a Circular Error Probable of about three meters, hit every one of their targets that had been set two days earlier. The Dagestan, a missile-armed frigate with a displacement of about 2,000 tons, acted as the flagship of the Russian naval assault force accompanied by the small missile patrol ships the Veliky Ustyug, the Grad Sviyazhsk, and the Uglich (with a displacement of about 1,000 tons). Kalibr-NK missiles are extremely difficult to detect: when maneuvering, an LACM flies at high speed in stealth mode, meaning that it emits no signals that would allow it to be tracked by radar.

Thanks to a successful Caspian Operation, the Russian Aerospace Defense Forces have added an entirely new and quite significant element to their air-combat capabilities in Syria. The most important feature of an LACM is that it strikes instantly and with unparalleled accuracy. They have a hugely demoralizing effect on the enemy, because even if the moment of launch is detected, he can not even predict in what geographic area they will hit. True to form, the US persists in demanding that Moscow ban such missiles, insisting that they violate theIntermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (but in fact that treaty prohibits only land-based LACMs). This initial real-world use of long-range LACMs by Russia has significant strategic importance, because the carriers of such systems (surface vessels and submarines), stationed elsewhere in the ocean, can minimize the potential use of nuclear weapons and offensive antiballistic systems by those states that still consider the Russian Federation to be their “biggest potential enemy,” an “aggressor state,” and an “annexing state.” 

These high-impact weapons systems could be used for preemptive or retaliatory strikes with non-nuclear warheads. Also, the landlocked Caspian Sea takes on strategic importance for Russia, because from there Russia can inflict surgical strikes using LACMs at the whole Middle East region, without risking countermeasures from NATO’s naval forces. Now that the Russian armed forces have debuted such high-precision weaponry, the Pentagon can stop throwing away its money trying to build up its military options that are aimed squarely at Russia. In other words, there is no need to spend significant amounts to station American tactical nuclear weapons in Europe or to deploy its land- and sea-based antiballistic infrastructure in Romania and Poland – or in the Asia-Pacific region – since it is perfectly clear that from now on all of that will stay in the cross-hairs of not only Russian LACMs, but quite soon of some even more effective hypersonic, high-precision long-range weapons equipped with non-nuclear warheads. One might hope that not only the Islamic State, but also Washington and NATO will arrive at immediate, tactical, and deeply strategic conclusions based on the Caspian Operation and will thus end their threats to use force against Russian aircraft and will understand that although they cannot be friends or “strategic partners” with Moscow, they must live in peace. 

O COLAPSO DO IMPÉRIO :

YouTube VIDEO - USA WatchDog - Greg Hunter - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 

"Sistema inchado implode e aí se vaporizam 40 trilhões: governos têm dívidas  insustentáveis".

"Criam dinheiro do nada, daí escravizam países com dívidas".

When the economy is not growing fast enough, and the skimming continues, then there is not enough left over for other people. That’s where we are in the story. That’s step one. Step two is will the banks convert all of their loans into physical hard assets, and the answer is yes.” The economy and banks are more debt filled than ever, and Dr. Martenson goes on to point out, “There is one thing we have a lot less of, and that’s trust. I don’t know anybody who loves these markets. Everybody is highly distrustful of them. All of the big money people that I talk with, all them have one foot right next to the exit. Everybody is convinced they will be able to get out just a little faster than the next guy. I think they are mistaken in that regard. Without that trust, and without that ability that the authorities are going to be able to contain it, I think we could see a very vicious downturn, something that gets out of control of the central planners. . . . Markets have a way of winning out in the end.” According to Dr. Martenson, watching the Fed to see when or if it will raise interest rates is not what people should be focusing on. Dr. Martenson explains, 

“Here’s what they should be focusing on. After 6 years of pumping trillions of dollars into the market, do we have the organic growth we need to pay off the loans that are already in circulation? The answer is no, we are not getting the growth. If we are not getting the growth and we have all these structural problems, that’s what people need to be focused on. That’s called reality. . . . You can smell the fear, and they are afraid of this market going down. This is a Franken market of the Fed’s own creation.” Chris Martenson, who also holds an earned PhD in Toxicology, says watch China because the recent signs are not good. Martenson contends, “You get your early signals from the place that is closest to the true economic action, and China is the center of that. So, to me, watching commodities tank first, gyrations in the Chinese stock market second, says third, you better be prepared for a big deflationary event or a big crash. . . . This is the mother of all crashes because the crash of 2008 was actually a side show. . . . We are going to discover that, like all bubbles, you return from where you started. . . . That means $40 trillion will have to get wiped out in the U.S. market alone.”

A HEGEMONIA SOBRE TODA A TERRA :

YouTube VIDEO - R.T. News - Oct 2015 - clik 1 
"Guerra ao terror: EUA não tem interesse em vencer".

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - Veterans Today - Press TV - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 - clik 3 
Ultra-direita Brzezinski à Rússia: "não ataque nossos terroristas, ou será 3a Guerra Mundial".

Former US national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski’s assertion that Washington should retaliate against Moscow for Russian airstrikes against US assets in Syria is a “stunning admission” of the role America has played in the Syrian crisis, an American scholar in Wisconsin says. Dr. Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance, made the remarks in a phone interview with Press TV on Tuesday while commenting on Brzezinski’s latest article about Russia in the Financial Times. Brzezinski advised President Barack Obama to attempt to disarm the Russians if they keep attacking the CIA-trained militants in Syria. “The Russian naval and air presences in Syria are vulnerable, isolated geographically from their homeland,” Brzezinski wrote on Sunday. “They could be ‘disarmed’ if they persist in provoking the US.” Dr. Barrett said that it is “a stunning admission from a senior high-level policy advisor here in the US that the US in fact using al-Qaeda, or perhaps the Islamic State [the Daesh/ISIL terrorist group] as well, as assets.” “This is not something that is normally admitted by officials from Washington, DC, that is that al-Qaeda in Syria, the al-Nusra Front, is actually a US ally,” he added. Brzezinski wrote that Moscow’s apparent decision to strike CIA’s militants “at best” reflects “Russian military incompetence,” and worst, “evidence of a dangerous desire to highlight American political impotence.” He added that if Moscow continues to target these people, then Washington should retaliate against Russians.

Commenting to Press TV, Dr. Barrett said that “the American people will be very interested to hear that just 14 years after the attacks of September 11th, 2001, which were officially blamed on al-Qaeda – which even then was called by some people al-CIA-duh, having had relationships with the US in the Afghan jihad against the Soviet Union – that this supposedly demonized enemy group that we were told was responsible for killing 3,000 Americans on September 11th, 2001 is now our ally in Syria, and we should to go war with Russia and risk a nuclear war that could end life on the planet in order to punish Russia for fighting against al-Qaeda.” “It’s kind of mind-boggling that anyone could even imagine the US retaliating against Russia for Russia’s attacks on al-Qaeda, but that’s precisely what Brzezinski said,” he stated. “And Brzezinski, for better or worse, is actually considered one of the more sensible and level-headed people in Washington, DC which tells you something about other people around him, the neoconservatives who are much crazier than even he is,” said Dr. Barrett, the author of Questioning the War on Terror. “I guess to explain this, we have just to note Brzezinski’s background; he is from a Polish nobility kind of family background which explains why he hates Russia so much, and has been trying to push aggressive policies against Russia throughout his whole life,” he pointed out. “But it’s still stunning and disgraceful that when Russia has intervened at the behest of the Syrian government, which is fully legitimate under international law, to shore up that government against these [terrorist] groups like al-Nusra and the Islamic State in order to try to stabilize the situation and lay the groundwork for a kind of peaceful solution, that the response from Brzezinski would be that we need to attack Russia,” Dr. Barrett observed. 

PRIMEIROS PASSOS DA 3a GUERRA MUNDIAL :

YouTube VIDEO - InfoWars - Sputnik News - Oct 2015 - clik 1 clik 2 clik 3 clik 4 
RESUMO DA GUERRA: varrendo terroristas, Rússia humilhou os EUA, escancarou a farsa armada.

Russia is putting on a display of fire power in Syria that is shocking the world and embarrassing the Obama administration. Darrin McBreen talks about how this latest showdown between super powers could escalate into a global conflict. [ ... ] “What we have to remember here is that Russia was able to achieve in two weeks' time what America did not achieve in two years’ time, meaning that the Russians were in and engaged these terrorists in the way the Americans were pretending to engage with these terrorists,” ... “So, what in fact was taking place is that the Russians have exposed the Americans for being the outright liars that they are. It was never America’s intention from the beginning to deal with these terrorists.”

On September 30, Russia began airstrikes against ISIL terrorists in Syria at the request of the government of President Bashar al-Assad. Since then, Moscow has carried out dozens of airstrikes against terrorists in Syria, killing hundreds of militants, Press TV reported. On Friday, a senior Russian general said there has been growing restlessness among ISIL militants with their command in Syria as they are getting ‘demoralized’ and are abandoning their locations and fleeing for their lives.

Povo-EUA já farto, é enxurrada de mentiras pró-guerra: com Iraque, Líbia e Síria - é só mais matança.

It is now clear, with the benefit of both hindsight and evidence from multiple sources, that the Barack Obama, with the full knowledge and support of Hillary Clinton, signed off on a secret finding sometime in late 2010 that authorized the CIA, and other intelligence organizations, to work with our foreign partners–the UK and the Turks in particular–to fund dissident groups and encourage protests that resulted in violent crackdowns by Libya, Egypt and Syria. For what purpose? Ostensibly to get rid of strongmen and light the fires of democracy. But we started a fire by passing money and weapons to radical Islamist, including the Muslim Brothers and, indirectly, Al Nusra and ISIS. This boneheaded policy has unleashed an inferno of murder and mayhem. And the response of Obama and his feckless team? To double down and try to create the pretense that we are serious about fighting ISIS when, in fact, our only interest is in getting rid of Syria Bashar al Assad. Vladimir Putin has exposed our charade. As I established in my post the other day, Why Are President Obama and the US Military Enabling ISIS?, the United States is not pursuing a serious strategy to destroy or dismantle ISIS. 

In fact, many foreign nations believe we have deliberately created and sustained ISIS as part of our policy to get rid of Assad. I don’t buy that theory, but I understand the natural confusion on that point. What I do not understand is why Republican are going along with this charade? Why are Republicans using belligerent, crazy statements to threaten Russia and agitate for a fight with the one country that has shown some serious resolve about fighting and killing Islamic radicals. The lies are now clearly exposed. What remains to be seen is whether Americans will continue to embrace those lies or, alternatively, wake up and demand truth from Obama and the Republicans still pushing for war. That is the matter before us. 

O COLAPSO DO IMPÉRIO :

YouTube - USA Watchdog - Greg Hunter - Rick Ackerman - Oct 2015 - clik 1 - clik 2 
"Sistema implode da noite para o dia, aí tudo de papel vira fumaça: depósitos, bancos, corretoras, pensões, nada de pé, só ruínas".

Ackerman says when the end game finally crescendos, it will be stunning and quick. Ackerman contends, “It will be literally overnight. There are investors who say I’m smart and I’m nimble, and I’ll be out of this at the first sign of trouble. I think the first sign of trouble will be a little bit too late. You will wake up one morning, and something will have happened in the Asian markets that cause the U.S. markets to open way below their circuit breakers or threaten to break the dam. It could all happen overnight, and I think it will. It’s the nature of the markets.” 

Ackerman says everything will shut down or be wiped out when the next crash explodes. Things like banks, brokerages and pensions can and will all go poof in a cloud of smoke. Ackerman goes on to say, “I don’t think anything will be left standing in the smoldering ruins. It’s very hard to imagine, but it is really going to be a complete disaster that is commensurate with the scope and scale of the lies we have been telling ourselves for so long. There are people who say you Chicken Little, doomsday, sky-is-falling guys almost seem to want the system to implode. I think the only way we get back to honest business is for a collapse to wipe away all the lies.”

One of the biggest lies comes from the Fed when it repeatedly keeps threatening to raise interest rates. Ackerman has been calling BS on a Fed rate hike for years and still contends, “I haven’t merely said the Fed wouldn’t raise rates. I’ve been shouting it from the rooftops. The answer to the question when will the Fed raise rates is never, and I am going to stick by that. That forecast has held up for nine years. So, it’s looking pretty good.” One of the very big problems with a rate rise is not just the increased interest payments on the federal debt, but also with derivatives in the hundreds of trillions of dollars which could destabilize the financial system. Ackerman explains, “It’s a global thing. We would be ratcheting up the interest payments on a quadrillion dollar derivatives market and, as you can imagine, that would unsettle a lot of arrangements. . . . I am going to stick with lower interest rates with the whole world slipping into recession.”